Under constitution
Governance framework, membership and SOPs are being developed. No claim of registered ethics review is made.
Responsible research requires credible governance, participant safeguards, approval pathways and precise disclosure of recognition status.
Governance framework, membership and SOPs are being developed. No claim of registered ethics review is made.
Recognition requirements and institutional readiness are being reviewed. This does not mean an application has been submitted or approval received.
The publication and editorial framework is being developed. No peer-review or ISSN claim is made at this stage.
For every project, the requirements depend on its design, participants, risk and applicable regulatory framework.
Ethics assessment and approvals through appropriately constituted and, where required, registered committees before human-participant research begins.
Proportionate consent, privacy protection, responsible engagement and additional care for vulnerable participants.
Methodological transparency, conflicts-of-interest controls, accurate reporting and correction of errors.
Access control, data minimisation, confidentiality, retention, anonymisation and secure processing.
Documented SOPs, method reviews, training, monitoring, audit trails and release checks.
Clear distinction between independent evaluation, contracted support and programme implementation.
DSIR’s SIRO scheme has defined criteria. Findings does not claim that recognition has been granted or that an application has been filed. Public status will be changed only against documentary evidence.
DSIR SIRO guidance ↗The Research Ethics Committee is under constitution. Biomedical and health research involving human participants must follow applicable ethics review, registration and approval requirements.
DHR Naitik portal ↗